Amy Soller's Reading List August 2001

# PAGES 1.      Intelligent Tutoring Systems
1.1 Historical Milestones
38 Collins, A., Warnock, E., and Passafiume, J. (1975). Analysis and Synthesis of Tutorial Dialogues. In G. H. Bower (Ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 9, pp.49-87, New York: Academic Press.
12 Connelly, J. & Lesgold, A. (1999). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In J. Webster (Ed.) Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (Vol. 10, pp. 529-541). New York: Wiley.
38 Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849-874). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
88 Gott, S., & Lesgold, A. (2000). Competence in the workplace: How cognitive performance models and situated instruction can accelerate skill acquisition. In R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in Instructional Psychology: Vol. 5. Educational Design and Cognitive Science (pp. 239-327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
de Kleer, J. & Brown, J. S. (1984). A Qualitative Physics Based on Confluences. Artificial Intelligence, 24: (pp. 7-83).
38 Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Bunzo, M., and Eggan, G. (1992). SHERLOCK: A coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job. In J. Larkin and R. Chabay (eds.) Computer-Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared goals and complementary approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
260 Polson, M., and Richardson, J. (eds.) (1988). Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15 Weischedel, R. M., Voge, W. M., and James, M. (1978). An Artificial Intelligence approach to language instruction. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 10, 225-240.
432 Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
1.2    Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Systems
(This group of papers covers recent research in AI-based CSCL. The research represented here concentrates on peer-to-peer dialogue and collaborative interaction.)
50 Baker, M. (1994). A Model for Negotiation in Teaching-Learning Dialogues. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(2), 199-254.
18 Baker, M. and K. Lund (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13: 175-193.
145 Burton, Mark (1998). Computer Modeling of Dialogue Roles in Collaborative Learning Activities. Ph.D. Dissertation.
34 Chan, T.W. (1996). Learning companion systems, social learning systems, and the global social learning club. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(2), 125-159.
10 Constantino-Gonzalez and Suthers (2001). Coaching collaboration by comparing solutions and tracking participation. Paper submitted to Euro-CSCL
 
9 Dillenbourg, P. and Self, J. (1992). People Power: A human-computer collaborative learning system. Proceedings of ITS ’92.
218 Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Elsevier Science.
19 Dillenbourg, P., & Baker, M. (1996). Negotiation spaces in human-computer collaborative learning. Proceedings of COOP'96, Juan-Les-Pins, France.
19 Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B., and Winograd, T. (1988). Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(2), 153-172.
10 Greer, J., McCalla, G., Cooke, J., Collins, V., Kumar, P., Bishop, A., & Vassileva, J. (1998). The Intelligent Helpdesk: Supporting peer help in a Univeristy Course. Proceedings of ITS '98, San Antonio, TX, 494-503.
60 Heisawn Jeong (1998). Doctoral dissertation.
7 Inaba, A. & Okamoto, T. (1997). Negotiation process model for intelligent discussion coordinating system on CSCL Environment, Proceedings of AI-ED 97, Kobe, Japan.  175-182.
8 Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (1999). An analysis of learner arguments in a collective learning environment. Proceedings of Computer support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ’99).
15 Joiner, R. (1995). The Negotiation of dialogue focus: An investigation of dialogue processes in joint planning in a computer based task. In C. O’Malley (Ed.) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10 Kanselaar, G., & Erkens, G. (1995). A cooperative system for collaborative problem solving. Proceedings of CSCL ’95.
8 Katz, S., Aronis, J., & Creitz, C. (1999). Modeling pedagogical interactions with machine learning. Proceedings of AI-ED ’99.
8 Katz, S. & O’Donnell, G. (1999). The cognitive skill of coaching collaboration. Proceedings of CSCL ’99.
20 Lesgold, A., Katz, S., Greenberg, L., Hughes, E., and Eggan, G. (1992). Extensions of intelligent tutoring paradigms to support collaborative learning. In S. Dijkstra, H. Krammer, J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Instructional Models in Computer-Based Learning Environments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 291-311.
Lund, K., Baker, M. & Baron, M. (1996). Modelling Dialogue and Beliefs as a Basis for Generating Guidance in a CSCL Environment, In ITS'96: Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, June, pp. 206-214. (see journal paper with Baker listed above)
29 McManus, M. & Aiken, R. (1995). Monitoring computer-based problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307-336.
35 Okada, T., & Simon, H. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 109-146.
12 Roschelle, J. (1996). Designing for cognitive communication: epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborating inquiry. In D. L. Day & D. K. Kovacs(Eds.), Computers, Communication & Mental Models(pp 13-25). London: Taylor & Francis.
18 Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
48 Suthers, D. Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Submitted journal article
30 Teasley, S. & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20 White, B., Shimoda, T., & Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, to appear.
2.      Educational Psychology
2.1 Learning Theory
(These papers cover the fundamental concepts in the theory of learning)
37 Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reinmann, P., and Glaser, R. (1989). Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
31 Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
126 Lesgold, A. and Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1989). Chapters 1-3 of Foundations for a Psychology of Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50 Groen, G. (1978). The theoretical ideas of Piaget and educational practice. In P. Suppes (Ed.), Impact of Research on Education: Some Case Studies (pp. 267-317). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Education
90 Baker, M. and K. Lund (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13: 175-193.
2.2 Small Group Learning/Group Dynamics
(These educational psychology papers look at social interaction in learning groups. The focus is on what comprises effective social interaction)
Bales, R. Strodtbeck, F. Mills, T. & Roseborough, M (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
19 Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and Instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34 Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
Cramer, S. F. (1994). Assessing effectiveness in the collaborative classroom. Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques. Kris Bosworth and Sharon J. Hamilton (eds.). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 69-81.
16 Doise, W., Mugny, G., and Perret-Clermont A. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 367-383.
37 Jarboe, S. (1996). Procedures for enhancing group decision making. In B. Hirokawa and M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and Group Decision Making (pp. 345-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9 Johnson, R., Johnson, D., and Stanne, M. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 668-677.
20 Katz, S., O'Donnell, G. and Kay, H. (2000). An approach to analyzing the role and structure of reflective dialogue. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, To appear.
Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 44, 585-612.
54 Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 415-469.
11 Miller, J., Trimbur, J., and Wilkes, J. (1994). Group Dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning. Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques. Kris Bosworth and Sharon J. Hamilton (eds.). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 59, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 33-44.
24 Moreland, R. L. Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. Witte  & J. H. Davis (Eds.) Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Vol 2, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 11-35.
150 Resnick, L., Levine, J., and Teasley, S. (eds.) (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Society, Washington DC. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 15, & 16
11 Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-98.
27 Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
or
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20 Stasser, G. (1999).  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, and D. Messick (Eds.), Shared Knowledge in Organizations (pp. 49-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26 Webb, N. and Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (2), 369-395.
32 Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group Processes in the Classroom. In D. Berlmer & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
3. Natural Language Processing
3.1 Discourse and Pragmatics
14 Jan Alexandersson, Norbert Reithinger, Elisabeth Maier. Insights into the Dialogue Processing of VERBMOBIL. Verbmobil-Report 191.Also appearing in the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing ANLP-97 
     
22 Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991).  Grounding in communication.  In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives
     on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149).  Washington, DC: APA.  Reprinted in R. M. Baecker (Ed.), Groupware and
     computer-supported cooperative work: Assisting human-human collaboration (pp. 222-233).  San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman
     Publishers, Inc.
100 P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack (Eds.) (1990). Intentions in Communication, Chapters 5,17,19,20. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
34 Cohen, P. and Perrault, C (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 177-211.
49 The COCONUT project: dialogue annotation manual by Barbara Di Eugenio, Pamela W. Jordan and Liina Pylkkänen, December  1998, ISP Technical Report 98-1. 
    
29 Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
10 Herring, S.C. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences.
Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
25 Levin, J. and Moore, J. (1977). Dialogue-Games: Metacommunication structures for natural language interaction, Cognitive Science, 1, 395-420.
20 Mann, W., and Thompson, S. (1986). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. TEXT, 8(3).
13 Moore, J. D., & Pollack, M. E. (1993). A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi-Level Discourse Analysis. Computational Linguistics.
7 Roth, D. (1999). Learning in natural language. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
70 Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, NLP Chapters 22-23 (pp. 651-720).
Silver, S., Cohen, B., & Crutchfield, J. (1994). Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face and computer-mediated idea generation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(2), 108-123.
30 Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-Dykema, C., and Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3).
17 Uszkoreit, H. (ed.) (1996). Chapter 6 of Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology (Varile, G. B. and Zampolli, A., eds.).  (see paper for authors of subsections)
3.2 Monitoring Dialogs
 
7 Chu-Carroll, J., and Nickerson, J. S. (2000) "Evaluating Automatic Dialogue Strategy Adaptation for a Spoken Dialogue System", Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 202-209.
4 Jordan, P. and Di Eugenio, B. (1997) Control and Initiative in Collaborative Problem Solving Dialogues. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative, Stanford, CA.
113 J. Moore (1995). Chapters 1,3,& 5 from - Participating in Explanatory Dialogues, MIT Press.
14 Megan G. Moser and Johanna D. Moore (1996). Toward a Synthesis of Two Accounts of Discourse Structure, Computational Linguistics 22(3):409-420.
6 Traum, D. (1999). Computational Models of Grounding in Collaborative Systems. In working notes of AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication, p. 124-131, November, 1999.
10 Marilyn Walker, Diane Litman, Candace Kamm and Alicia Abella. PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents.In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics , ACL 97, 1997. 
      
4. Machine Learning
70 Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning. Chapters 3 & 4 (Decision Trees and ANNs)
30 Charniak, E. (1993). Statistical Language Learning. Chapters 3 & 4 (Hidden Markov Models)
29 Rabiner, L. (1989). A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2).(Note: sections on continuous HMMs omitted)
TOTAL # Pages:
3328